开发者认为通过 CLI 使用编程智能体的方式已过时，交互正直接面向智能体展开。其当前方案结合 dots 这类高层持久智能体与 Codex desktop 专用会话，并由自建 agent orchestrator and harness 管理，可兼顾 Grok bot 的简单交互和 Codex desktop 的深度会话。
Use of coding agents via CLI has been dead for a while now.
We are early on discovering better interfaces but interactions now happen directly with agents and will continue that way going forward.
What is working for me is a mixture of high-level persistent agents (like dots) and specialised agents (like codex desktop sessions) that are themselves managed by the persistent agents or accessible at anytime when I need to do focused work.
This provides me lots of flexibility and I can leverage a variety of experiences and interactions with agents that range from the simpleness of grok bot to the more involved sessions offered by codex desktop.
These again are some of the advantages
I enjoy because I have built my own agent orchestrator and harness.
I haven’t touched Claude Code or Codex CLI in a while. The terminal era is over imo. It's the wrong interface for coding agents. Tabs are ephemeral, but context is persistent, and managing 30 tabs is pure cognitive overhead. I don’t really need an IDE like Cursor either. I rarely navigate the whole codebase anymore. The new primitive is the agent, not the file. (Codex desktop app is the best agentic UI for now. But we’re still early.)在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：elvis · x.com