跳到正文
原文
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 7 天前AI 评分54
AI 导读

Mark Zuckerberg 表示 Llama 3 曾非常接近前沿水平,但 Llama 4 偏离了所需路线。他认为问题在于像 Instagram 信息流和广告业务那样配置数百至数千人并行推进,而前沿模型更需要小而紧密的科学团队。

正文

Mark Zuckerberg talks about why the Llama run broke after Llama 3.
says Llama 3 was a very good model and almost at the frontier, then Llama 4 fell off the path they needed.

His read is that he staffed it like Instagram feed and ads, with hundreds or thousands of people in parallel, when a frontier model needs a small tight science team.

"When you're an entrepreneur, you're building something, I think you kind of get tested in those moments because inevitably not everything is going to go well. And the things that kind of define the trajectory are, okay, if something doesn't go the way that you want, how do you basically figure out how to move forward?"

----

From "The Next Big Thing" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com