Show HN:用 ChatGPT、Claude 与 BAAB AI 测试同一个创始人融资困境
作者将“现在融资 50 万至 75 万美元,还是继续自力更生”的同一提示词分别输入 ChatGPT、Claude 和 BAAB AI,三者均建议不要仅凭故事融资。
作者将“现在融资 50 万至 75 万美元,还是继续自力更生”的同一提示词分别输入 ChatGPT、Claude 和 BAAB AI,三者均建议不要仅凭故事融资。
作者用同一 three.js 提示词让 GPT-6 Astra 与 Claude Opus 5.5 一次性生成《看不见的城市》交互可视化。
确实。我想补充一点,如果你知道如何在此之上构建好的 eval,你很快就能在你的领域/任务中处于前沿。这就是 eval 能为你解锁的那种优势。 也要学会构建好的 eval。这值得。
You can basically work with agents to write markdown skills and put it on a cron job and do almost every useful type of knowledge work now
作者复测国际象棋对局后,GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct 对 GPT-5.6 Sol 和 Claude Opus 5 取得四战全胜,并在去年以六比零击败 o3、Grok 4 和 Gemini 2.5 Pro,总计十战十胜。
Hacker News 有提问指出,新模型发布仅数小时后,就有评论者断言其毫无价值或堪称重大突破,质疑这些人尚未充分测试模型。提问者怀疑评论者盲目相信易被操纵的 benchmark,并询问究竟该如何衡量一个模型优于另一个模型。
Grok 4.7 takes the TOP 3 spots on VulcanBench Frontier v4, outperforming Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol and other leading frontier models • Grok 4.7 xHigh - 93.15 • Grok 4.7 High - 92.71 • Grok 4.7 Medium - 92.30 VulcanBench Frontier v4 tests whether AI models can handle difficult repository-level software engineering work rather than simply generate isolated code snippets The benchmark contains 23 behavioural-reconstruction tasks where models have to rebuild legacy software to match its actual behaviour, with functional correctness tested through hidden tests alongside security, lint/complexity and code quality And the task results are just as impressive: • Grok 4.7 xHigh - 23/23 passed • Grok 4.7 High - 22/23 passed • Grok 4.7 Medium - 21/23 passed Grok 4.7 took all #1, #2 and #3 spots
Here's a fun benchmark we ran: 8 decision models playing Tetris. In our tests @perplexity_ai Decider came consistently at the top !! ( cc @AravSrinivas ) you can try em out here - https://app.routerplus.com/playground/tetris-royale
Import AI 第 475 期讨论 Toby Ord 对 swarm scaling 的分析:4 智能体 swarm 用约两倍 token 可将任务时间理论减半,但规模扩大存在收益递减。
刷榜模型与真正在意可靠性的人打造的模型之间,存在一个关键差异,而从定义上讲,这个差异不会体现在基准测试中 (我们在字符串大语言模型上多少已经学到了这一点……)
@julianharris There's something wet-sponge-feeling about the qwen fine tunes that I can't explain compared to Jev
Anchor Terminal 对 462 个面向 AI 智能体的工具进行排名,列出类别、等级、总分、智能体评分、价格和 x402 等信息。OpenAI Agents SDK 以 86.5 分排第 1,OpenAI API、Stripe API + MCP、Infisical 等紧随其后;等级从 AA 到 F,BB 或更高才算 agent-ready。
研究者让 Meta Muse、Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 Medium 和 OpenAI GPT 6.1 Sol Medium 分别用英语补全美国、用波斯语补全伊朗在世界银行全球公共采购数据库中的缺失信息。
“We find that on medium-length, well-defined accounting tasks, frontier AI models are now faster and more accurate than junior accountants, even the best one in our study.” Eighteen months ago they scored well below human accountants Good discussion here: https://www.mercor.com/blog/human-baselines-for-benchmarks-ai-now-outperforms-junior-accountants/
'More striking is how fast AI took the lead. Just eighteen months ago, the best AI models fell short of the average accountant’s ~37% score. Today, models ace those same tasks.' 'These results are provocative. So much so that we considered not publishing them for fear of misinterpretation. But we think transparency about the findings matters as people and institutions prepare for rapidly advancing AI.'
作者分析多个金融智能体基准后认为,82.2% 等头部分数主要反映干净输入、单次运行、宽松评分和简化环境下的表现,不能直接等同于真实金融工作可交付能力。
推荐理由:文章把金融智能体基准分数拆解为输入预处理、运行次数、评分规则和环境简化等差异,便于团队按自身工作流校准可用性。
Google 回来了??? 在各方面都优于 Astra 和 Opus 5.5。 如果这不只是刷榜,我很乐意看到他们重新加入竞赛。
如何测试人工智能的人类级通用性? “能够在 ARC-AGI-(n+1) 发布后立即通过它,这一元基准”
@Jabaluck @DAcemogluMIT The meta-benchmark of being able to pass ARC-AGI-(n+1) immediately upon release. Though presumably that won't last forever.
再次强调,我极其反对基准测试(: (引用推文核心:不要再搞“Jevbench”,不要再要求公开基准测试;它们完全没抓住 Jev 的要点,而且你珍视的每个基准都极易被刷分。选对任务比什么都重要。)
STOP making "Jevbench"es, stop asking for public benchmarks, they completely miss the point of Jev and you won't believe how easy it is to game every benchmark you hold dear This is @CompleteSkeptic's bitterest lesson of all: picking the right task beats everything
Anthropic 新发布的 Claude Sonnet 5.5 在对比中表现超过 OpenAI 的 GPT-6-Astra,其 Agentic Coding 测评分数比 Claude Opus 5.5 更高,其他分数也与 Opus 5.5 接近。
ARC Prize 2026 - ARC-AGI-3 Progress Prize - 9 day left $37,500 in prizes are being awarded on *Sept 30th* to the top open source solutions Current standings: 1. Tufa Labs 2. Lord Han Solo 3. NVARC3 Which top 3 will claim the open source prize?
Fable 在 KernelBench-Mega 上写出 megakernel,基于 RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 的 CUDA 实现相对优化 PyTorch 基线 18.71X 加速。