跳到正文

#评测/基准

今日 1 条
今天10月13日周二
10月7日周三
  1. Hacker News:AI 热帖32

    Ask HN:为什么人人都成了 LLM 专家?

    Hacker News 有提问指出,新模型发布仅数小时后,就有评论者断言其毫无价值或堪称重大突破,质疑这些人尚未充分测试模型。提问者怀疑评论者盲目相信易被操纵的 benchmark,并询问究竟该如何衡量一个模型优于另一个模型。

10月6日周二
  1. Elon Musk46

    Grok 4.7 非常擅长处理大型代码仓库

    引用X Freeze@XFreeze

    Grok 4.7 takes the TOP 3 spots on VulcanBench Frontier v4, outperforming Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol and other leading frontier models • Grok 4.7 xHigh - 93.15 • Grok 4.7 High - 92.71 • Grok 4.7 Medium - 92.30 VulcanBench Frontier v4 tests whether AI models can handle difficult repository-level software engineering work rather than simply generate isolated code snippets The benchmark contains 23 behavioural-reconstruction tasks where models have to rebuild legacy software to match its actual behaviour, with functional correctness tested through hidden tests alongside security, lint/complexity and code quality And the task results are just as impressive: • Grok 4.7 xHigh - 23/23 passed • Grok 4.7 High - 22/23 passed • Grok 4.7 Medium - 21/23 passed Grok 4.7 took all #1, #2 and #3 spots

10月5日周一
10月4日周日
10月3日周六
10月2日周五
  1. Rohan Paul62

    Rohan Paul 引用 Mercor 的会计任务评测并评论称,规则型工作不再是职业,而是提示词。Claude Opus 5 在 20 项任务中全部答对,几分钟完成一项;12 名持牌 CPA 得分从 0% 到约 90% 不等,数人用完 3 小时。配图显示,按每个正确评分标准计算,Claude Opus 5 成本为 $0.21,未使用 AI 的会计为 $10.35,相差 49 倍。

    引用Ethan Mollick@emollick

    “We find that on medium-length, well-defined accounting tasks, frontier AI models are now faster and more accurate than junior accountants, even the best one in our study.” Eighteen months ago they scored well below human accountants Good discussion here: https://www.mercor.com/blog/human-baselines-for-benchmarks-ai-now-outperforms-junior-accountants/

  2. Elon Musk42

    超级智能(前称 AI)如今在会计测试中表现出色

    引用Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_

    'More striking is how fast AI took the lead. Just eighteen months ago, the best AI models fell short of the average accountant’s ~37% score. Today, models ace those same tasks.' 'These results are provocative. So much so that we considered not publishing them for fear of misinterpretation. But we think transparency about the findings matters as people and institutions prepare for rapidly advancing AI.'

  3. Hacker News:AI 热帖80

    金融 AI 智能体基准分数为何应像 Adjusted EBITDA 一样打折审视

    作者分析多个金融智能体基准后认为,82.2% 等头部分数主要反映干净输入、单次运行、宽松评分和简化环境下的表现,不能直接等同于真实金融工作可交付能力。

    推荐理由:文章把金融智能体基准分数拆解为输入预处理、运行次数、评分规则和环境简化等差异,便于团队按自身工作流校准可用性。

10月1日周四
9月30日周三
9月29日周二
  1. Diogo Almeida28

    再次强调,我极其反对基准测试(: (引用推文核心:不要再搞“Jevbench”,不要再要求公开基准测试;它们完全没抓住 Jev 的要点,而且你珍视的每个基准都极易被刷分。选对任务比什么都重要。)

    引用Latent.Space@latentspacepod

    STOP making "Jevbench"es, stop asking for public benchmarks, they completely miss the point of Jev and you won't believe how easy it is to game every benchmark you hold dear This is @CompleteSkeptic's bitterest lesson of all: picking the right task beats everything

9月22日周二
  1. François Chollet29

    2026 年夏天在 AI 领域真是疯狂…… ARC Prize 2026 的 ARC-AGI-3 进度奖还剩 9 天,将于 9 月 30 日向顶尖开源方案颁发总计 $37,500 奖金;当前排名前三为 Tufa Labs、Lord Han Solo、NVARC3。

    引用ARC Prize@arcprize

    ARC Prize 2026 - ARC-AGI-3 Progress Prize - 9 day left $37,500 in prizes are being awarded on *Sept 30th* to the top open source solutions Current standings: 1. Tufa Labs 2. Lord Han Solo 3. NVARC3 Which top 3 will claim the open source prize?

7月6日周一